IT-Analysis.com
IT-Analysis.com Logo
Enterprise SME Business Issues Technology Services Channels
Module Header
Bob TarzeyQuocirca
Bob Tarzey
5th September - Google at 10
David TebbuttTeblog
David Tebbutt
4th September - Office 2.0 unconference
Judith HurwitzJudith Hurwitz
Judith Hurwitz
4th September - Is Anticipation Management a Game Changer?
Peter AbrahamsAbrahams Accessibility
Peter Abrahams
29th August - Non-accessible websites will be costly
Simon HollowayRFID Scanlines
Simon Holloway
28th August - US DOD issue an RFP for Active RFID
Module Header
Q. What topics do you want covered on this site?
 
  • addtomyyahoo4
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Add to My AOL
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to netvibes
  • Add to Google
Blogs > Fern Halper
Decisions and consequences
Fern Halper By: Dr Fern Halper, Partner, Hurwitz & Associates
Published: 19th January 2008
Copyright Hurwitz & Associates © 2008
Logo for Hurwitz & Associates

Not everything is easy. I analyzed data for decision-making for many years using advanced techniques such as predictive modeling, machine learning and even influence diagrams. With the rush to pervasive BI we often forget about the need for truly sophisticated analysis to aid in complex decision making. I'm talking about decision support for critical strategic initiatives such as managing a portfolio of investments, preparing for terrorist threats, or modeling sales spending for drug marketing when dealing with competing products. In other words, analysis of dynamic situations where multiple outcomes are possible.

Past performance is not a guarantee of future results

What is constant is that the world does not remain constant. The future is dynamic, change is expected and traditional BI can only take you so far in the decision game. Often, it is necessary to determine a series of plausible futures or explore the consequences of possible decisions. DecisionPath, a Boston based company uses the "past performance" phrase above to drive home some of the limitations of BI. I had a very interesting briefing with Richard Adler, the CTO of DecisionPath, the other week. He correctly pointed out the following:

  • BI technology helps to examine the past and today and how we got there.
  • Predictive analysis is useful if the future doesn't change, which of course it will, necessitating updating the models (if possible).
  • BI can provide high quality input into decision-making, but it doesn't provide the whole picture because the world is dynamic.
  • BI does not actually support the process of decision-making (i.e., actively enabling or enhancing it). Think about the word process here.

DecisionPath offers a product called ForeTell that helps to develop and test decisions. ForeTell combines various complementary simulation techniques in one framework. So, whereas a software vendor might provide some of these techniques, DecisionPath has put them together in one framework that works together with BI systems to model, simulate, and explore possible decision outcomes and test alternative decisions. Here is an illustration, provided by DecisionPath, that describes the relationship between BI and ForeTell:

ForeTell

source: DecisionPath

This is not your ma and pa BI and it clearly not for everyone. DecisionPath has made good inroads in the government, pharmaceutical, and financial sectors where complex analysis is the norm. However, alternative decisions with complex tradeoffs exist in all industries to some degree so certainly the approach is applicable to a wider range of verticals than those listed here.

Reader Comments

We are no longer accepting comments against this item. We suggest contacting the author directly.

Advertisement



Published by: IT Analysis Communications Ltd.
T: +44 (0)203 051 5760 | F: +44 (0)870 345 9922
Email: