Since the web has increasingly become the platform for
interacting with customers, partners and the like, the notion of
managing the online experience has skyrocketed. The term "user
experience" is confusing. I have traditionally thought about this
in terms of how the user interacts with software. But I am finding
that the more interesting definition is around the idea of actually
measuring and monitoring the performance of the web environment
from the user or customer experience perspective.
I met with an emerging vendor called SYMPHONIQ that was founded in 2003
by Hon Wong, CEO. Wong is a veteran of the management space, having
been one of the founders of NetIQ in 1995 and of EcoSystems
(purchased by Compuware
in 1994). Therefore, although SYMPHONIQ is a relative newcomer,
it's management team has lots of experience under its belt.
The company is just introducing its second
product—TrueView Express. This product is intended to provide
performance measurement and monitoring. The product measures
browser response for any HTTP application. Therefore, the company
says that it can track performance from the browser through to the
database. The product monitors actual user transactions in real
time, isolates performance problems, and includes service level
reporting of transaction performance.
Because TrueView is instrumented with HTML it does not require
the downloading of an agent. In addition, performance data is
collected behind the firewall.
In a way, this product is a sort of trojan horse (I love trojan
horses since they provide a quick value to customers) for the
company's higher end products. For example, its flagship product,
called TrueView, provides end-to-end diagnostics.
Clearly, the company has some interesting IP and some traction
in the market. It made a smart move by partnering with F5 Networks.
F5 Networks provides a platform for Application Delivery
Networking. This relationship should help the company gain traction
with customers that might otherwise look towards the big
players—CA (Wily), EMC (NLayers),
Compuware,
and HP—and a host of others.
The company seems to be making some progress in the market with two
products under its belt and a couple of dozen customers such as
Lockheed, Starbucks Coffee, and AMD. The reality, however, is that
the company is in a space dominated by big companies so it will
have to partner with some big players that will be attracted by its
ability to correlate and aggregate actual transaction data. Its
reliance on HTML and HTTP means that it provides a lighter
footprint than some of its competitors. This is definitely a
company to watch.
We are no longer accepting comments against this item. We suggest contacting the author directly.
12th November 2007: 'Simon Griffiths' said:
There are simpler ways of doing this. We use a combination of programs to the same effect.
To look at the macroscale, Google Analytics is great and free. It gives you a good overall feel and is great to see if you are getting your customers from one place to another.
If you identify a problem area and want to look more closely, try Crazy Egg (www.crazyegg.com). That tracks clicks on your site, and gives some great views that filter on keywords and the like.
Lastly if you are can see a problem, but aren't 100% sure what it is, try Clicktale (www.clicktale.com). This records mouse movement and is great to see confusion in navigation, and is a real user experience tester.
All these utilities have free versions, and paid versions with more features. None are expensive either.
The great thing is that in general these services are all easy to apply to your site with a couple of lines of javascript, and yes they do maintain a level of anonymity for your visitors.
Reply to Simon Griffiths?
13th November 2007: 'Simon Griffiths' said:
That is very true, but things like CrazyEgg and Clicktale will show you where the problem is, not necessarily what it is. A great example of this is a site we used where we actually saw that a product range name we had was confusing people navigating through the site. When it was pointed out to us via CrazyEgg it was obvious that was where the problem lay, but unless you see the 'confusion' you would have never spotted it.
If you are looking at server side issues, I would suggest you install Firebug (www.getfirebug.com I think). That installs into Firefox and includes a tab called "Net" which shows you file sizes and how long each took to download. I can tell you for example that this page is 269kB, the largest file being a png image which is the banner on the right. I have recently used this to analyse one of the sites my company has, but I don't control, and found all sorts of problems with file sizes and latency.
Reply to Simon Griffiths?
