IT-Analysis.com
IT-Analysis.com Logo
Enterprise SME Business Issues Technology Services Channels
Module Header
David TebbuttTeblog
David Tebbutt
19th November - Collaboration: the old way. Why not?
Martin BanksBanks Statement
Martin Banks
18th November - This Cloud has a silver lining
Peter AbrahamsAbrahams Accessibility
Peter Abrahams
18th November - Major new accessibility features in Firefox 3.0.4
Martin BanksBanks Statement
Martin Banks
17th November - Psychology of data ownership may be changing at last
Tony LockFreeform Comment
Tony Lock
16th November - Clouds yet to fill the IT skies
Module Header
Q. How many email addresses do you have?
 
  • addtomyyahoo4
  • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
  • Add to My AOL
  • Subscribe with Bloglines
  • Add to netvibes
  • Add to Google
Blogs > MWD
Microsoft server and tools is now part of the business division
Neil Macehiter By: Neil Macehiter, Research Director, Macehiter Ward-Dutton
Published: 21st May 2007
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Logo for Macehiter Ward-Dutton
The ever-vigilant Redmond watcher Mary Jo Foley over at ZDNet reports that Microsoft's Server and Tools unit (but not the P&L—Microsoft will still report server and tools financials), which is responsible for Microsoft Windows Server, SQL Server, Visual Studio, System Center management products and Forefront security products, is now part of the Business Division, the home of Office and Dynamics.

Mary Jo finds this move 'curious' but I can see the logic. It's hinted at (if you get past the marketing speak) in the company's official statement that it made the move to:

sharpen leadership focus on the company’s top priorities and align its organization for innovation, ultimately enabling it to deliver even more value to its customers.

I think this is all about making it easier for Microsoft to articulate propositions which resonate with the key concerns of senior business and IT people. The reality is that key strategic business and IT initiatives—SOA, BPM, compliance, etc—increasingly depend on multiple technologies and associated competencies, which cross traditional stovepipes. Big SOA, for example, is about managing IT work across the entire service lifecycle and so touches project and portfolio management, software development and integration, IT service management. BPM, as the other Neil pointed out, is about Office as much as it is BizTalk and Workflow Foundation.

In the past, the way that Microsoft has been organised has worked against the articulation of such joined-up propositions (that's in part why it took the company so long to talk about SOA). Customers would get different answers to the same cross-cutting requirement depending on which Microsoft stovepipe they were talking to: you need BizTalk and SQL Server; you need OBA and SharePoint. [As an aside, I said much of this in an interview with Microsoft PR earlier in the week].

Obviously, shifting branches of the org chart is comparatively easy (even it is very big). The hard part is going to be changing behaviour, joining up the marketing etc. The creation of the Connected Systems Division back in 2005 shows that the company can pull this sort of thing off (albeit on a smaller scale in the Server and Tools Business as was) and Jeff Raikes, who now owns the combined entity, has the influence and power to drive things through at this larger scale.

I am off to a Server and Tools Business analyst event in just over a week so I will hopefully learn more then.

Reader Comments

We are no longer accepting comments against this item. We suggest contacting the author directly.

Advertisement



Published by: IT Analysis Communications Ltd.
T: +44 (0)203 051 5760 | F: +44 (0)870 345 9922
Email: