Enterprise performance management - the story continues...
Quocirca has completed the second cycle of research and analysis
for Oracle around enterprise performance management (EPM), and
the headline results show a massive improvement across the six
sub-indices and the overall EPM index. Surely, then, this is good
news?
Underneath the headline figures lay various findings that show
that while awareness of how EPM can help an organisation has
grown, existing technical systems are often ill-suited to meeting
the business process requirements of an organisation, while the
wish to invest in new systems has shrunk as recessionary budgets
remain in force.
Also, the findings show that while respondents understand the
need for better processes in each area, there is still a lack of
overall belief that these processes need to be linked to gain the
maximum benefit from an EPM approach.
The research looked at six different areas; stakeholder
environment, market model, business model, business plan,
business operations and business results. The stakeholder
environment sub-index, which looks at how inputs from and the
needs of customers, suppliers, shareholders and legal bodies were
dealt with by those involved in the overall EPM financial
processes of an organisation. As with the first cycle of the
research (carried out in February 2009), this sub-index resulted
in the lowest showing overall. Although the majority of
respondents felt that they had consistent and repeatable
processes in place to engage with stakeholders, far fewer felt
that key stakeholders had a true and transparent view of the
corporate strategy. Either the process of engagement is flawed,
or the messages being passed through the process are poor -
either way, this points to a lot of work needed to make the
overall process workable.
However, at the other end of the process, the business results
sub-index resulted in the highest performance overall. It is
therefore tempting to look at the results and think, Hang on - if
all the processes leading up to the business results are
sub-optimal, why is the business result itself so strong? Good
point, but one that is best looked at against a real world
vertical example.
In the world of finance, we see that the business results up
until 2007 were excellent: it seemed that the house of cards
could continue to be built up and up without any issues. Then,
sub-prime hit and the cards came tumbling down. Those
institutions that were hardest hit suddenly realised that the
processes that led up to the final results were flawed:
stakeholders were not involved in key decision making, and
strategies had not been well communicated. Chasms between various
areas within the institutions themselves led to processes being
broken as information was not treated transparently or
consistently as it traversed from one part of the organisation to
another. Internal risks were not evaluated properly, and
employees were compensated more on immediate than on long-term
results, leading to higher risk taking that was uncontrolled.
In effect, Quocirca believes that the EPM research is still
reflecting this. Many organisations are still profitable despite
poor internal processes. If they were to look at how best to
apply fully cohesive and coherent EPM processes, not only could
savings be made across the board, but new opportunities could be
opened up through greater flexibility, as could the capacity to
play the key what ifs? around new product or service offerings.
The good times of the early to mid 2000s allowed many process
issues to remain hidden, whereas the past two years have rapidly
uncovered major process failings.
It is, as yet, not apparent as to whether the recession is over
and that the world will now move back to mid-term growth. Many
commentators believe that a second wave of recession will hit
many countries. With effective EPM in place, an organisation will
be far better placed to survive a second recession - and to do
well once out the other side. Although full EPM will involve
investment in new technology to underpin the processes, it will
be money well spent.
After all, what is the point in saving money and going out of
business?
The Quocirca report on the Oracle EPM index, Enterprise
Performance Management: Cycle II, is available for free
download
here.
We automatically stop accepting comments 180 days after a post is published. If you would like to know more about this subject, please contact us and we'll try to help.