IT-Analysis.com
IT-Analysis.com Logo
Business Issues
Enterprise SME Business Issues Technology Services Channels
Module Header
Philip HowardBloor IM Blog
Philip Howard
8th February - Bribery
Nigel StanleyBloor Security Blog
Nigel Stanley
8th February - Conficker grounds police checks
David NorfolkThe Norfolk Punt
David Norfolk
3rd February - What's wrong with "security"
Laurie McCabeLaurie McCabe
Laurie McCabe
2nd February - What is Total Cost of Ownership, and Why Should You Care?
Philip HowardBloor IM Blog
Philip Howard
2nd February - Calpont finally comes to market
Module Header
Q. What features do you want to see on this site?
 
Analysis
IBM Scoops Sequent in $810 Million Deal
[No Image] By: Jack of Hearts, Analyst, Bloor Research
Published: 13th July 1999
Copyright Bloor Research © 1999
Logo for Bloor Research

IBM and Sequent officially announced a merger today, July 12th, although it is easier to think of it as a takeover. IBM will pay 8 a share for Sequent putting a total value of 10 million on the company. Sequent was founded in 1983 and pioneered Symmetric Multiprocessing (SMP) and Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA) systems for commercial environments. In 1997, it was the world's fastest growing vendor of servers in the 00,000 to m. Sequent had above 10,000 installations worldwide, and in 1998 it introduced the NUMACenter mixed Unix and Windows NT targeted at the data centre. Sequent could claim to be the leader in high-end Intel hardware, although such a claim would of course be disputed by NCR.

In its last reported quarter, the first quarter of fiscal 1999, Sequent announced revenue of 94.0 million and net income of .2 million. In had set up an ASP nursery and was collaborating with IBM and SCO on Monterey, a new version of Unix, which would converge the capabilities of the different Unix offerings from each of the vendors.

For IBM the merger is complementary. IBM has done well at the top end of the Unix market and has also established itself in the Windows NT market with its Netfinity range of hardware. However the Sequent NUMACenter must have looked very attractive to IBM as must some of the key customers that Sequent had attracted. Additionally, IBM did not have the close relationship with Intel that Sequent has. On the other side of the coin, Sequent was not growing dramatically and was finding the competition tough especially from IBM itself.

This move by IBM leaves it dominant in the UNIX MPP (Massively Parallel Processing) market and will help IBM in its push into the new ebusinesses, some of which were running on Sequent hardware

Reader Comments

Sorry, we are no longer accepting comments on this item. We suggest trying to contact the author directly.

Advertisement



Published by: IT Analysis Communications Ltd.
T: +44 (0)190 888 0760 | F: +44 (0)190 888 0761
Email: